Links

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
bloodwrites: (Default)
[personal profile] bloodwrites

[personal profile] fogsrollingin directed me to this conversation on reddit which is a (generalised) definition of curative vs transformative fandom.

This subject has been an interest of mine for many years, and is informative and relevant on its own, but it reminds me of the changes that have come about in the last half-decade or so in fandom.

It has become evident that the influx of fandom goers resulting from the mainstreaming of fandom is changing the dynamic once again. Curative fandom seems much the same, cis-dude heavy and off over there somewhere.

But residing in the same spaces as transformative fandom there is also consumptive1 fandom. Vast swathes of fans who consume fic and art voraciously but don't produce anything. And while the majority are no doubt innocuous and appreciative of the fanworks transformative fandom creates, there is a loud contingent who are entitled and offensive in their demands.

They demand fic updates, they tell creators that the fic would be better if it was a different ship, they harass other fans for shipping the wrong ship...

Yep, it seems the majority of antishippers are consumptive fans, who never produce anything but are toxic in their insistence that all of fandom produces and consumes fanworks in the right way and if they don't they'll be sorry.

Like curative fandom skewing cis-male, consumptive fandom has its own demographic, and it skews overwhelmingly young. This explains a lot in regards to the entitlement and insistence that everyone else should do fandom in a way that they deem right and correct and moral (kids and teens overwhelmingly seem to view the world with them at the center).

But as transformative fandom tends to be more grown-up and logical, it's difficult for us to share the same spaces as the consumptive kids. In the past, antishipper harassment had a chilling effect, forcing out and shutting up transformative voices, curbing creativity and slowing the production of new works (personal experience - previously prolific, my output slowed to a crawl circa 2016 onwards, and I avoided consumptive-heavy spaces for years).

But it's difficult to imagine how transformative and consumptive fans can exist entirely separate from each other like transformative and curative do, because the consumptive fans are consuming our works. They followed us from tumblr to twitter and to AO3 and are likely following artists from twitter back to tumblr as I write this.

Of course Dreamwidth exists in a separate (and oh so calming) bubble. My experience is that it's almost entirely transformative, and I'm not opposed to sharing space purely with those who, generally speaking, share my values.

Fandom spaces on Mastodon, too, are much the same. Though there's entire instances populated by yet another group, which I've started referring to as neo-proshippers, but that's another post entirely and I think I've already gone on too long 😁

  1. Please don't take any of this as me looking down upon the many many fans who lurk or just read or just reblog. I've known many of these fans over the years and they're fantastic, they make the best rec lists and leave the best comments and generally are a part of transformative fandom. The 'consumptive' fans, as I've dubbed them, are a whole 'nother thing entirely, and they're new (last 5-10 years), and they come like locusts, devouring fandoms en masse before moving onto the next.

xpost

Date: 29 Nov 2022 02:48 am (UTC)
bluedreaming: pink-toned digital art of a mouse holding/reaching for a blossom under the moon, inspired by a haiku by Issa (**summer evening mouse)
From: [personal profile] bluedreaming
This is always a little mind-boggling, since consumptive fandom is just so different from how I personally view both fandom and creative works in general.

But it's difficult to imagine how transformative and consumptive fans can exist entirely separate from each other like transformative and curative do, because the consumptive fans are consuming our works.

Hypothetically, it could be possible by turning off comments, removing all contact info, and only talking with other transformative fans in other spaces like dw, closed discords, forums, etc., but that has its own problems.

(Also, seconding loving the lurkers!)

Thanks for sharing this thoughtful post.

Date: 29 Nov 2022 03:49 pm (UTC)
gracerene: (Default)
From: [personal profile] gracerene
So interesting!! I've often call this trend towards "captialist fandom" for lack of a better term, but you really capture so eloquently what I've noticed, and particularly how the newer social media platforms for fandom tend to kind of encourage this it seems--I absolutely see the benefit of places like twitter and tumblr for fans to engage in a way that requires less effort than, say, journal platforms, but I also think, in a way, that tends to make it easier and easier to become more consumptive, and particularly for fans who "grew up" entirely on those platforms (and, in a different socio-political landscape) it's not super surprising, even if it's a massive bummer. :/

Date: 30 Nov 2022 02:47 am (UTC)
lookitmychicken: (Default)
From: [personal profile] lookitmychicken
Neo-proshippers?

Please tell me more, if/when you feel like it.

Date: 30 Nov 2022 12:39 pm (UTC)
dreamersdare: (Default)
From: [personal profile] dreamersdare
I think you're right that the two threads of fandom cannot exist independently. Or rather, consumptive fandom needs transformative fandom; it's skewed toward a one sided dependence, depending on your thoughts on the necessity of feedback for creators (which in turn raises up questions about the exercise of power and control and the extent to which consumptive fandom seeks to take control through these negative narratives). I'm spitballing there though, because while I am vaguely aware of this going on in the background, the only place I'm active/interactive is DW which, as you say, draws in the more transformative or passively consumptive.

I suppose consumptive fandom is by its nature parasitical, which I honestly say as an observation without any intended judgement. I am that one author who turned off comments on AO3 the second that option became available with great delight. Not because of any issues or problems I was having with comments from particular people, but because I'm genuinely much happier with a passive model of "I wrote a thing, I liked the thing (at least enough to admit it's mine), here fandom, have the thing" *fling fic into the internet abyss and immediately forget about it and move on to the next thing*. I guess because meaningful interaction with other fannish types is a thing I really enjoy, but AO3 is not the right platform for that. I think it's lovely that people do leave appreciative comments as a concept, and I know for a lot of people it makes their day to get one, but that doesn't hold true for me because I find them more of a chore to be completed than a reward/acknowledgement of my work. I'm much happier to leave people alone to consume whatever they want to from my works and I'll leave them alone to move onto the next one.

Slightly at a tangent there, but the point being that consumptive fandom works well for my mindset, and because I don't want/need the positive feedback, it's easy for me to duck the negative, mostly because I end up imposing that level of non-interactive passivity onto everyone which leaves no room for that vocal minority (and I suspect they are a minority) to exist in my sphere.

So, be antisocial creator and smother problem out of existence? I suspect it's not a philosophy that will catch on :)

Date: 3 Dec 2022 09:46 pm (UTC)
lookitmychicken: (Default)
From: [personal profile] lookitmychicken
Oh. Well, that's less good.

I've been wondering if it might actually become an issue that we define blorbo.social as 'pro-shipping'. It's not a term I've been much aware of before the last year or so. I've always been in the parts of fandom where shipping was the assumed default, and the idea of anyone being anti-shipping was ... weird.

I don't want that toxic association, obviously.